Vs 25: Dww Kim Ly

Vague references like “25” (if indeed a statutory section) must be interpreted consistently. The case would clarify the scope of that provision.

The proceedings of Dww v. Kim Ly were notable for their intensity. Dww’s counsel opened with a rhetorical appeal to heritage, warning that upholding Statute 25 would result in "legalized erasure." They posited that the Statute was designed for commerce, not for the adjudication of personal or sovereign legacies. Dww Kim Ly Vs 25